Add additional tabs to the group. To edit your tab group, right-click the colored circle or name to the left. Right-click a tab and then select Add to new group. On your computer, open Chrome.
Chrome Change The Visited Link Color How To Change VisitedHover over the Hover Over Me text below. DevTools supports :active, :focus, :hover, :visited, and others. Use the Styles tab to permanently apply a CSS pseudostate to an element. Cls section of the Styles tab Add a pseudostate to a class. Heres how to change visited link color in Google Chrome.The colorme class has been applied to the element via the.It’s not particularly dangerous by itself, but when it’s combined with getComputedStyle() in JavaScript it means that someone can walk through your history and figure out where you’ve been. However, you can install an extension, such as New Tab Page , in Chrome to For many years the CSS :visited selector has been a vector for querying a user’s history. Hover Over MeChrome saves the last eight websites you visited as thumbnails on the New Tab page, but you can’t customize the page with your own websites, so it’s not quite the same thing.We’re not sure what release this will be part of yet and the fixes are still making their way through code review, but we wanted to give a heads up to people as soon as we understood how we wanted to approach fixing this.Customize any website to your color scheme in 1 click, thousands of user styles. To do so we’re making changes to how :visited works in Firefox. But I only like Firefox And I need to be able to test my own site live.At Mozilla we’re serious about protecting people’s privacy, so we’re going to fix this problem for our users. Given that browsers often keep history for a long time it can reveal quite a bit about where you’ve been on the web.But on the live version, the visited links are the leftover red color, which means that hovering has red text with red background: yuck (The 2 reds are not identical but too close for readability.) The hyperlink colors are what they should be in Chrome and Edge. At that rate, it’s possible to brute force a lot of your history or at least establish your identity through fingerprinting. We’re limiting the CSS properties that can be used to style visited links to color, background-color, border-*-color, and outline-color and the color parts of the fill and stroke properties. You will still be able to visually style visited links, but you’re severely limited in what you can use. They will always return values as if a user has never visited a site. getComputedStyle (and similar functions like querySelector) will lie. At a high level here’s what’s changing: If you’re using background images to style links and indicate if they are visited, that will no longer work. But there are a couple of areas that will likely require changes to sites: If you’re using nested link elements (rare) and the element being matched is different than the link whose presence in history is being tested, then the element will be drawn as if the link were unvisited as well.These last two are somewhat confusing, and we’ll have examples of them up in a separate post.The impact on web developers here should be minimal, and that’s part of our intent. If you use a sibling selector ( combinator) like :visited + span then the span will be styled as if the link were unvisited. There are a couple of subtle changes to how selectors work as well: In addition, for the list of properties you can change above, you won’t be able to set rgba() or hsla() colors or transparent on them.These are pretty obvious cases that are used widely. Best simple spreadsheet for macThat allows for one, global rule for all links, regardless if there are differently colored links in one document.Privacy protection is always welcome, but it shouldn’t come at a too high price. But why the possibilities for styling needs to be limited escapes me.It’s a bit of a bummer, because I’ve often solved the problem of differentiating visited links from unvisited links by reducing visited links’ opacity by a small fraction, instead of replacing the color altogether. Discover great resources for web developmentSign up for the Mozilla Developer Newsletter: Blizzard has done a nice roundup of David Baron’s post, the bug and the post on the security blog which discusses the :visited March 31st, 2010 at 22:02 Older Article April 12th, 2010 at 11:41It’s funny because I just recently read an article describing how this CSS attack worked and I just got into this developer preview so I’m pretty happy to see this (even though I doubt anyone I know would know how to pull this off.) April 17th, 2010 at 08:21What about css gradients? April 21st, 2010 at 12:03Personally, I can see why getComputedStyle needs to lie. Please leave a comment here with more information so others can see it as well. If you see something that’s going to cause something to break, we’d like to at least get it documented. There isn’t that much CSS Transition content on the web, so this is unlikely to affect very many people, but it’s still worth noting as another vector we won’t support.We’d like to hear more about how you’re using CSS :visited and what the impact will be on your site. ![]() This way, we could still put a padding and a sprite for the background, and change the position of the background for visited links only, therefore showing checkboxes or whatever only there :) May 25th, 2010 at 11:49Because then the malicious script could know from a server-side script when a specific url is called and each unique url would have it’s own “background-url” property. May 21st, 2010 at 16:57Well, what about something nicer: you don’t allow changing the background, but you’d still allow for background positioning. Otherwise you could do:Background: url(/logvisited?somedomain.com) That doesn’t even need JavaScript to scrape URLs. April 23rd, 2010 at 17:20Yes, I had thought about the box size measurements… But why forbid background-image or opacity modification? It would have been a good way to still be able to present users with pretty checkboxes, for example :) May 17th, 2010 at 02:18I don’t know about opacity, but background image must be blocked. April 23rd, 2010 at 17:21Could canvas/SVG be used somehow to map the element in and then grab the blitted pixels? April 26th, 2010 at 19:28But you could still add a 1px padding to all links exept visited, and then getComputedStyle (if it returns a empty string then it is visited)Can’t you make that :link styles apply to :visited also? That way you couldn’t make different styles for themAnd it’d be greate if you add the outline to the supported styles for :visited, becouse it wouldn’t affect the others (would it?)…Setting to false Firefox’s “layout.css.visited_links_enabled” option completely disable visited link styling and I think that it’s a too drastic solution.Why not to introduce an option that permit to style visited link ONLY IN THE CURRENT DOMAIN?It may substitude “layout.css.visited_links_enabled” option with, for example, an “layout.css.visited_links_scope” option with numeric values: 0 = visited link totally disable, 1 = visted link enabled only for the current domain, 2 = visited link totally enabled May 27th, 2010 at 03:19Very good point and the logs are here anyway.But there should have a nother key to restrict that behavior to the nth level of the domain name, otherwise this will be abused through free or ISP-related hosting offers housing malicious scripts.P.S. So this change will be in all the browsers soon enough. May 24th, 2010 at 17:21I will also point out that the changes have been checked into WebKit that work just like the changes we made to Gecko. The browser could render everything as if the link was unvisited, store that in getComputedStyle, and then visually present a re-rendered page that allows any CSS on visited links. July 7th, 2010 at 09:16Ha, that would be an idea. June 14th, 2010 at 18:53 improvements: Mozilla always puts privacy first, and this latest beta fixes flaws in some Web standards that could expose your browser July 6th, 2010 at 14:38It’s a good thing that Firefox 4 will use SQLite instead of JSON or XML,SQLite is a lot faster. Perhaps there is a way for the browser to recreate CSS effects internally (e.g., via Javascript). Guys did you even heard about similar technic based on checking image cache by measuring the speed of image loading? June 13th, 2010 at 20:36Are these restrictions intended to be a long-term solution or merely a temporary patch? It would be regrettable if removing CSS support became the norm for coping with security issues.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorDeangelo ArchivesCategories |